Brian Clark uses a number of techniques to dramatise the Euthanasia Ess

Brian Clark uses a number of techniques to dramatise the Euthanasia Debate in his play, Who's Life is it Anyway Brian Clark uses a number of techniques to dramatise the Euthanasia Debate in his play, "Who's Life is it Anyway". Euthanasia is the means by which a person has the freedom of choice over whether they live or die. In the play there are two main arguments concerning this issue. One argument saying that a patient has the right to make this decision of life and death and on which disagrees and says the patient should not have this choice. Two characters in the play represent the two central arguments. First of all there is Ken, Ken believes that he should have the right to choose to die, it is his life, he says that his whole life before his accident was sculpture, and now that he cannot sculpt because he is paralysed below his neck, he will never be able to sculpt again: 'I'm almost completely paralysed and always will be. I shall never be discharged by the hospital.' According to Ken his life is already over: 'Of course I want to live but as far as I am concerned, I'm dead already†¦I cannot accept this condition constitutes life in any real sense at all.' 'Any reasonable definition of life must include the idea of it being self-supporting.' Ken only wants the dignity in death: 'each man must make his own decision. And mine is to die quietly with as much dignity as I can muster'. Ken also argues that he is not asking his lawyer to make a choice over his life or death, just to represent his views to the hospital: 'I'm not asking you to make any decision about my life and death, merely that you represent me and my views to the hospital.' Ken argues that the real matter to be discussed is the ind... ...ise the full impact of what he has been fighting for. He will no longer be there once he has won his case. Ken will cease to exist. This helps us to understand why some people are anti-euthanasia, and what grave consequences it has and why euthanasia is an extreme solution to take. The theatre offers many possibilities of visualising and dramatising this debate, the medical and legal jargon used in the two acts of the play, the physical space of the stage and the lighting in combination, the black comedy of Ken, the exits and entrances of different characters that are used as mouthpieces of different views on the debate. Issues are raised in the play as they could not be in prose. There is a suspension of disbelief, a contract between the playwright and the audience makes sure that the issues are well explored and continue to be in a 30 year-old debate.

Introduction to Personality

Introduction to Personality Paper Katie McMichael Axia College of University of Phoenix November 26, 2012 Introduction Who am I? What are my good qualities? What are my bad qualities? Why do I behave like that sometimes? Why can’t I stop doing this? How do I see myself? How do others see me? How did my personality come to be what it is today? How has it changed? When thinking about our personality, these are questions that we ask ourselves. The only way to answer these questions is to observe ourselves and analyze what we found as a result of this research.There are several theories of personality that were introduced in order to do just that. The purpose of this paper is to further understand personality and it’s concepts by defining personality, Examining theoretical approaches in studying personality, and Analyzing factors that may influence an individual’s personality development. Defining Personality Since so many theories of personality exist, there is no s ingle definition. The most widely accepted of personality is â€Å"a pattern of relatively permanent traits and unique characteristics that give consistency and individuality to a person’s behavior. (Feist & Feist, 2009) as you can see from the definition, each personality is different from each other. Also, from the definition you can see that personality is made up from the combination of characteristics and traits and serves as its base structure. Characteristics and traits are adjectives such as pretty, overweight, athletic, anxious, smart, etc. These adjectives help to give you a sense of self as well as influence your behavior. The reason that these traits and characteristics are the base structure of your personality is because they have consistency and stability in your behaviors over time. Feist & Feist, 2009) Traits have more to do with actions or physical appearance. For example, blue eyes would be considered a trait. A characteristic is merely anything that stand s out or is noticeable that can be used to describe them. For example a pitched laugh can be a characteristic. Although similar, these two parts are different, what is similar is that they work together in developing patterns what is known as your personality. People will have similar characteristics or traits that will produce similar personalities but no two personalities will ever be the same. Theoretical ApproachesAs stated earlier there are many different theories of personality. Each theorist has different methods, research and obviously conclusions as to why personalities are what they are and why they are so different from one another. One thing is certain with each theory is that a specific order of approach is important to substantiate a theory. Most theories of personalities grow from the personality of the theorist (Feist & Feist, 2009). As stated earlier, in order to get a better understanding of personalities, including your own, you must start with observations and ex perimental research.Psychologists use systematic approaches such as assessment techniques to support their hypotheses. Tests such as the Big Five Personality Test are the most valid and accurate personality assessment to date. The Big Five Personality test breaks down five areas of personalities which include dimensions such as: openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism. When it comes to other tests, the two types of validity focused upon by psychologists are construct and predictive.In construct validity â€Å"A test has construct validity if it demonstrates an association between the test scores and the prediction of a theoretical trait. †(Cherry, 2012) An example of construct validity would be an IQ test. In predictive validity â€Å"the criterion measures are obtained at a time after the test. †(Cherry, 2012) An example of this would be a career aptitude test. Both are hypothetical tests based on traits and preferences and neither wo uld be extremely accurate. These tests would be a way to get an idea of where you are and where you might end up based on your personality.Factors that Influence Personality There are two generally accepted factors that contribute to personality development which are heredity and environment. Obviously, if your traits are heretic, they were past to you through your genes from your parents and other ancestors. These traits are commonly skin color, eye color, hair color, face shape, height, and body shape. â€Å"Research by psychologists over the last several decades has increasingly pointed to hereditary factors being more important, especially for basic personality traits such as emotional tone. (Neill, 2006) This is different than what most people think. Most people seem to believe that environmental factors are substantially more influential because they have root in our morals, beliefs, and behaviors. Environmental facts that would influence personalities would be that of childh ood upbringing, learning atmospheres, social interactions, occupational interactions, and child rearing. All of these unique influences contribute to personality and even if two people have the same experiences they will respond to them different.For example men and women are different and interact and respond different usually because their upbringing is different. â€Å"Boys and girls are socialized differently to some extent in all societies. They receive different messages from their parents and other adults as to what is appropriate for them to do in life. †(Neill, 2006) It is hard to tell which factor is more influential but as you can see each one plays an important part. It doesn’t really matter what has the most influence, just important to remember that they both have influence. ConclusionWhether you take a test or just observe yourself for a while you might find out more about yourself than you knew. Observation and research are what really keeps us finding new things, why not ourselves? With a little time and effort, a person can accomplish anything. With each unique person and each personality we are doing more and learning more every day. The world never stops changing and neither do we. Our personality above all changes its face day to day from birth to death. That is what makes us unique, that is what makes us different from the animals.We have the ability to change and are smart enough to recognize it. We can define it, analyze it, study it, observe it, but our personality is always going to change as we do. In essence, our personality makes us the people that we are. References Cherry, K. (2012). What is validity? Retrieved November 26, 2012 from http://psychology. about. com/od/researchmethods/f/validity. htm Feist, J. , Feist, G. (2009). Theories of Personalities. (7th ed). New York: McGraw-Hill O’Neill, D. (2006). Personality Development. Retrieved November 26, 2012 from https://anthro. palomar. edu

Unit 7 Assignment Interpersonal Communication Kaplan...

Unit 7 assignment Claudia Garcia From the interaction, does it seem to you that Alan is actively listening? Why or why not? From the interaction, it is obvious that Alan is not actively listening. First, he is not being mindful. According to Wood (2010), â€Å"mindfulness is being fully present in the moment†. In the interviews, Alan looks anxious to finish and seems to have many thing in his mind that do not allow him to be completely present. Second, he is not being person-centered (Wood, 2010). For example, when the second employee tells him about his son’s illness he is not able to practice dual perspective in order to understand how the employee feels and understand his concerns. Finally, he is not responding. According to Wood (2010)†¦show more content†¦Alan’s attitude generates a tense relationship between him and his employees. In the future, they are not going to tell him what difficulties they are having which can decrease productivity. Also, if Alan practice good listening skills, he will be able to have a good communication with his employees to avoid misundersta ndings and confusions in the different tasks assigned. In conclusion, Alan’s listening skills can produce a negative environment that can affect not only job performance, but also emotions between his employees. Identify specific comments by Alan that show he is either effectively listening to his employees or that he is not. It is evident that Alan is not effectively listening in both interviews. In the first interview the specific comments that prove this are: * When he tells the employee, she is too slow. She tries to give a valid explanation. Alan responds: â€Å"Look, I don’t want to lose you but you have to work more quickly.† He does not take the time to ask question or elaborate more on his employee explanation. Conversely, she threats her about losing her job. In the second interview the specific comments are: * When the employee tries to explain him that the reason he is being absent or late lately is because his son has been sick. He answers: â€Å"Can we just focus on the work for now?† With this answer, Alan is not showing dual perspective and he looks uncaringShow MoreRelatedUnit 7 Assignmen Cg Essay753 Words   |  4 Pagesï » ¿ Unit 7 Assignment Chiquita Gorham CM206: Interpersonal Communications Kaplan University January 10, 2014 Identify three quotes from the dialogue that show how Bryce progressed in ethically identifying his emotions. Three quotes from the dialogue that show how Bryce progressed in ethically identifying his emotions would be when Todd asked him if he had stopped looking for work. His response was â€Å"After a year of applyingRead MoreJan Ken: Managing Conflict in Relationships Essay1691 Words   |  7 Pagesï » ¿ Jan Ken: Managing Conflict in Relationships Unit 9 Assignment Marie Holloway Kaplan University Author Note: This research is being submitted on March 11, 2014 for Mark Lambertson’s CM206 Interpersonal Communications course. Q #1: Using the chapters on language and emotions to help frame your answer, suggest two ways that Ken could open this conversation more productively, beyond clearly expressing his emotions and using â€Å"I† language. Ken could have usedRead MoreGb580 Unit 11980 Words   |  8 PagesTheresa Guillory GB580 – Strategic Management Unit 1 Individual Assignment Professor Stephen Griffith Kaplan University October 28, 2012 My name is Theresa Guillory. I am a single mother of 3 wonderful kids: Gaylon, Dante and Madeline. I am currently employed at Texas School of Business in Houston, Texas. This organization is owned by Kaplan Higher Education. I am the Program Director for the Dental Assistant Program. I have been with the organizationRead MoreCase Study : Bachelor s Capstone For Human Services2460 Words   |  10 Pages Unit Nine Assignment: Jorge Edward Jacobs HN499: Bachelor s Capstone for Human Services Kaplan University 4/7/2015 Our agency assists low income seniors living on fixed incomes with mental health services. Our services include screenings for depression, dementia, and early onset of Alzheimer’s. We also provide mental health counseling services for grieving widows and work towards reconnecting individuals with support services in the community. Jorge is a 67 year old Hispanic maleRead MoreThe Implementation And Adoption Of An Lms7342 Words   |  30 Pagestheory of Diffusion of Innovations (Rogers, 1995, 2003b, 2003a), including the perceived attributes for the adoption of innovations within large organizations. It will include the implementation of new technology, and how leadership decisions and communication play a role in the adoption process. Together, these sections provide a deeper understanding of crucial elements needed for an implementation framework, and underlying information for the research questions being explored. . Learning ManagementRead MoreAn Analysis of Financial and Business Performance of Indus Motor Company Limited10485 Words   |  42 PagesOxford Brookes University Research and Analysis Report [pic] An analysis of financial and business performance of Indus Motor Company Limited Prepared by: Murtaza Yunus Marvi (1270201) Dated: 26 Sep 2008 Word Count: 6496 Table of Contents CONTENTS PAGE NUMBERS PART 1: Project objectives and overall research approach Read MoreSales and Marketing for Financial Institutions80443 Words   |  322 PagesTOPIC 2 TOPIC 3 TOPIC 4 TOPIC 5 TOPIC 6 TOPIC 7 TOPIC 8 TOPIC 9 INTRODUCTION DISCLAIMER These materials are issued by Kaplan Higher Education on the understanding that: 1. Kaplan Higher Education and individual contributors are not responsible for the results of any action taken on the basis of information in these materials, nor for any errors or omissions; and 2. Kaplan Higher Education and individual contributors expressly disclaim all and anyRead MoreStrategic Management and Leadership25577 Words   |  103 PagesLevel 7 in Strategic Management and Leadership The London Academy for Higher Education: Extended Diploma in Strategic Management and Leadership Course Manual 2011 / 2012 Contents How to use this Manual About the London Academy for Higher Education About the Extended Diploma in Strategic Management and Leadership Course Module Brief Entrance Requirements Core Units Unit 1: Developing Strategic Management and Leadership Skills Unit 2: Professional Development for Strategic Managers Unit 3: StrategicRead MoreMgmt 309 Chapter 1 Test Bank Essay5760 Words   |  24 Pages Delta Airlines and Gucci are all examples of a. bureaucracies. b. corporations. c. organizations. d. managerial hierarchies. e. centralized units of operation. ANS: C PTS: 1 REF: p. 4 OBJ: 1.1 NAT: AACSB: R MSC: Type: App 2. Which of the following is an example of an organization? a. The Department of Education b. Princeton University track team c. Starbucks d. Swoopo, online auction site e. All of these choices ANS: E PTS: 1 REF: p. 4 OBJ: 1.1 NAT: AACSB: R MSC: Type:Read MoreEffect of Globalisation on Management Accounting6683 Words   |  27 Pageshave been faced by a confluence of forces of change during the past decade. Chapter 3 defined change, and more particularly the concept of morphogenic change. The three major drivers of change were discussed in paragraph 3.3, namely computer and communication technology, globalisation and the influence of knowledge management in business organisations. Verma (2002:9), in her deliberations on the impact of change on the development of accounting (based on research by Gray and Hofstede (1988), Robson